Case Study

How a Battery Manufacturing Lab Streamlined Instrument Integration with Scispot GLUE

June 19, 2025

Share on XShare by emailCopy link
Pouch cells clipped into cycler channels with cables merging into one hub, representing battery instrument integration

Hurdles

LIMS Vendor Integration Resistance

Complex Multi-Protocol Data Management

Manual Data Processing Bottlenecks

75%

Reduction in Data Entry Time

90%

Faster Integration Setup

60%

Improvement in Data Accuracy

Company Overview

  • Organization: Battery Manufacturing Lab.
  • Industry: Advanced Battery Manufacturing & Materials Testing.
  • Headquarters: North American Manufacturing Corridor.
  • Plan: Scispot Professional.

Challenges

Before using Scispot, the lab faced several operational bottlenecks:

  • Manual Data Bottlenecks: Staff spent significant time each week manually transcribing data from various instruments, such as Arbin battery cyclers, BioLogic workstations, and Malvern particle analyzers.
  • Integration Resistance: Previous vendors were unable or unwilling to demonstrate live connectivity with specialized battery equipment, which made it difficult to justify the return on investment (ROI).
  • Complex Data Management: The lab struggled to maintain seamless integration across diverse data types, including cell formation data, impedance spectroscopy results, and materials characterization.

The Scispot Solution

Scispot GLUE provided a solution through:

  • Extensive Instrument Library: Utilization of over 250 pre-built instrument connections for rapid deployment of testing workflows.
  • Live Demonstrations: Providing clear proof of real-time data flow during the evaluation phase, which helped validate the ROI.
  • Automated Workflows: Implementing automated parsing for complex data (such as charge/discharge curves and C-rate performance) while maintaining audit trails for certification requirements.

Results

The lab achieved significant efficiency and compliance improvements:

  • Time and Efficiency Gains: Data entry time was reduced by 75%, and context-switching inefficiencies were eliminated by connecting instruments directly to the database.
  • Faster Deployment: The integration setup was 90% faster than traditional LIMS providers, dropping from a 6–12 month deployment timeline to just 4–6 weeks.
  • Accuracy and Compliance: Data accuracy improved by 60%, and the system established automated audit trails essential for ISO 9001 and automotive OEM qualification.

Testimonial

"Battery development cycles are incredibly tight, and we needed seamless integration between our formation equipment, cyclers, and characterization instruments... The 250+ pre-built integrations meant we could focus on battery innovation instead of wrestling with data silos between our formation protocols and quality testing workflows."— Quality Systems Manager

‍

Share this case study

Share on XShare by emailCopy link

Check our blog

Insights, trends, and product updates from our team.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.